They Said What?

Home » overdiagnosis » SSM and HealthFair: what happens when you don’t use Google

SSM and HealthFair: what happens when you don’t use Google

Do you know whether heartburn pills are safe for long-term use?

Quizzify knows. Click to learn more.

saint mary

By Vik and Al

SSM Healthcare is one of the nation’s largest hospital and healthcare systems (more than $3 billion in annual revenues). Based in St. Louis, Vik happens to live in their catchment area, and he was recently treated a promotional mailing promoting a veritable orgy of screenings for cardiovascular disease. SSM has partnered with an organization called HealthFair, which will drive one of its buses to a Walgreens near Vik, where he can clamber on and get screened.

The pitch is that Vik could get a package of six screenings, available for a limited time for the promotional price of $179 (total “value” $2,300), with an additional Know-Your-Numbers lipid panel assessment for just $99. Combine both offers and get an additional $20 off, with a total price of just $258. The six-test package of screenings includes:

  • Echocardiogram ultrasound
  • Stroke/carotid artery ultrasound
  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm ultrasound
  • EKG
  • Peripheral artery disease (PAD) test
  • Hardening of the arteries test (also called the Arterial Stiffness Index or ASI)

Let’s take a hard look at each of the recommended screenings. For the sake of consistency, we look first to the published recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) which is the closest thing we have to an independent, credible arbiter of data on preventive services. In cases where the USPSTF has not made a recommendation, we look to the literature.

USPSTF AAAAbdominal aortic aneurysm ultrasound: Rated “B” only for men aged 65 to 75 with a history of smoking. It’s a C for men in that age with no smoking history, “I” or inconclusive for women 65 to 75 who’ve smoked, and a D (more harmful than helpful) for women in this age range with no smoking history. Why does the promotional material contain no stratification by age, gender, or smoking status?

Stroke/carotid artery ultrasound: rated a D for all adults who are asymptomatic. Someone with symptoms doesn’t need a screening; they need a workup and therapy.

Carotid stenosis D





Echocardiogram ultrasoundEcho screening no benefit: the USPSTF doesn’t even have a recommendation on this, so we look to the literature. A large, long-term study from Norway, published in JAMA Internal Medicine in 2013, concluded that echo has no prognostic value. This jibes with the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography, articulated at Choosing Wisely, that echo is overused even in people who are symptomatic and should be avoided in people who have no reason to get one.



Electrocardiography or EKG: USPSTF rates this a D for adults with no symptoms and of inconclusive value even for people in moderate or high risk categories.ECG screening D


Peripheral artery disease (PAD) test: The USPSTF rates this screen as I or inconclusive. They do say, however, that the incidence of PAD in the general population is unknown. While this testing has value in people who are symptomatic, they were not coy about its value in people with no symptoms: “The USPSTF found no evidence that screening for and treatment of PAD in asymptomatic patients leads to clinically important benefits.”


Hardening of the arteries test (also called the Arterial Stiffness Index or ASI): The USPSTF has no recommendation on this. But, the American Heart Association, which typically doesn’t softsell cardiac goods and services, completely disses this test: “On the other hand, genotyping, other lipoprotein and apolipoprotein measurements, natriuretic peptides, hs-CRP for high- or low-risk adults, brachial/peripheral flow-mediated dilation, measurement of arterial stiffness, contrast computed tomography angiography and plaque imaging by magnetic resonance imaging are not recommended (Class III). The lack of support for these tests may change as more evidence is acquired. However, future recommendations will have to fully consider cost-effectiveness before reclassifying them.” AHA arterial stiffness



In sum then, we would like to know how and why SSM and HealthFair are selling their St. Louis audience a package of six screenings that, with only one exception, are recommended NOT to be done by the evidence-based medical community.  Read that carefully.  “Recommended NOT to be done” is different from — way worse than “Not recommended to be done.”

And yet this hospital seems to be unfamiliar with medical guidelines.

A cynic might say “No, they have an internet connection that reaches USPSTF and understand medical guidelines.  They choose to ignore them, in order to create followup revenue for the (mostly false) positives that these tests will inevitably reveal.  And the reason they are practically giving them away is that they not covered by insurance because the Affordable Care Act requires health plans to cover only screens that are A or B rated by the USPSTF.  However, all the followups will be well-reimbursed.”

SSM is not alone in the screenings charade; in fact, in St. Louis, Vik is regularly treated to an onslaught of screening propaganda from Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University in St. Louis: currently making the claim that “where you get your mammogram matters.” Other than singing the virtues of their own radiologists and perpetuating the myth that early diagnosis is the same as a life saved, we see no evidence on the Siteman website that their strategy actually reduces mortality. Last fall, Siteman was running an ad on St. Louis radio station enticing women to come get a mammogram and register for a cruise vacation.

Our suggestion to generally healthy, symptom-free adults living near any one of these organizations? Use your $179 to buy a couple of really good pairs of running shoes instead. Then, when some medical care vendor starts yammering to you about the predictive and life-saving values of screenings, you can literally run for your life.

Don’t depart without reading our Smoking Gun entry on SSM at this link.

Quizzify 4

The fun way to save your employees from the medical care industry





  1. […] M(edicine). Very eloquently, Paul raised some every significant questions based on the blog, SSM and Health Fair: what happens when you don’t use Google, and the experience of Vik Khanna in his blog post Over Diagnosis . These were not low cost […]


  2. […] to ourselves, and how the very notion what it meant to be an American is slowly being eaten away. A rapacious and often fraudulent healthcare industry is one of the essential tools in this […]


  3. […] mail is still chock of full of medical garbage. Read about the unethical and deceptive ads by SSM Healthcare Of St. Louis. The Affordable Care Act, rather than rationalizing healthcare services, emboldens and empowers […]


  4. […] at the public teat until they are gorged on either subsidies or direct payments and then they go on fishing expeditions to screen the people who live in their catchment areas for diseases that most people don’t have. But, the mere […]


  5. […] (Shoddy Cardiovascular Screenings are more likely to cause harm than good). Also, I recommend this summary (which points out in well-referenced detail that these are not recommended by major preventive […]


  6. Dr. AnthonyP says:

    I put a link to your excellent post here on my most recent critique of the SSM/HealthFair cardiovascular screening at the skeptical cardiologist. You will have to “approve” it as a comment in order for my readers to link to it.
    Keep up the great work!
    By the way, I was forced to do an online wellness survey with St. Luke’s to quality for insurance and I was incensed by their silly advice to drink 8 cups of water daily.


    • whynobodybelievesthenumbers says:

      thanks. I don’t what wellness vendors find so hard about connecting to the internet and learning that the “8 glasses of water” thing is an urban legend disproved decades ago.


In the immortal words of the great philosopher Pat Benatar, hit me with your best shot.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: