Home » Posts tagged 'Seth Serzner'
Tag Archives: Seth Serzner
This posting should be read in conjunction with Part 2 of the proof that wellness doesn’t work, which in turn links to Part 1 that shows mathematically wellness can’t work.
During the Great Debate, both Ron Goetzel and Optum’s Seth Serxner accepted our previous proof, albeit reluctantly. However, Seth Serxner at first objected to it, saying something along the lines of: “Yes, wellness admissions haven’t fallen. However, without workplace wellness, wellness-sensitive medical admissions (WSMEs) would have risen. We kept WSMEs from rising.”
We explained to him how this wasn’t the case, and promised that we would post the analysis, so that he wouldn’t have to take our word for it. So here it is.
Since $11.3-billion was spent on these admissions in the private-pay population according to the wellness industry’s own HERO Report, these events would have had to rise by at least 60% in order to make the claim that the $7-billion wellness vendor industry broke even by avoiding them. If indeed workplace wellness prevented this huge increase in the privately insured population, one would expect that these very same events would have risen by something similar to 60% in the non-privately insured population–meaning the combined Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured.
As researchers might say, the privately insured population was “exposed” and the remaining US population was “non-exposed.” As wellness spending snowballed, the separation between those two populations’ WSME trendlines should have increased significantly.
Instead, we find these populations WSME-as-percent-of-total-admissions also flat-lined, just like the private-pay population. Ironically, to the extent there is a difference, the population without access to workplace wellness trended slightly more favorably in WSME admission rates than the population with access to workplace wellness.
The graph below compares WSMEs — or what the HERO Guidebook refers to as Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations (PPH) — over this century, using the national Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project database.
Likewise, the idea that wellness events have indeed fallen on an absolute basis in the employed population due to wellness is also a fallacy. These events have fallen even faster in the population not privately insured.
This analysis is copyrighted to Quizzify but may be made available to disinterested researchers and media upon request.