Hate to knock Interactive Health off the front page, but this just in

The bullet points are that diabetes vendors claims credit for savings based on:

1. Squirrelly “predictive modeling” of cost reductions that have not yet occurred
2. Assuming employees pre-diabetes would almost immediately turn into high-cost diabetics absent their intervention
3. Comparing participants to non-participants (why are vendors still pretending this is a thing?)
4. Claiming that people are going to keep their weight off
5. Lying

This doesn’t cover their other sleight-of-hand, which is charging via claims instead of admin fees, and positioning that opacity as a feature rather than a bug.

Here is the link to the whole ball of wax.