Try our sample Artificial Sweeteners quiz to see how much you already know – and/or learn some rather scary things that you really should know. Four $25 gift cards will be awarded via drawing from the 10 highest scorers who are also advisors or self-insured employers or transparent PBMs.
Further, we’ll reveal the best way to avoid their hazards while still using them, since sometimes we just gotta have something sweet. Water or flavored water just won’t do the trick.
This month’s contest closes August 29th. The ten high-scorers will be announced August 30th. Based on the formula we use (matching the winners to the last 4 digits the August 31st stock market close), four winners will be randomly selected from the ten high-scorers and announced September 3rd.
Oh yeah, and if you want to see how to prevent initial uptake of weight loss drugs specifically amongst employees who are likely to drop out after a few months, join our September 5th webinar for The Big Reveal.


Thank you, keep these columns coming.
LikeLike
will do. Darn day job (Quizzify) keeping me busy, though, so probably once a week for the most part.
LikeLike
Al, IMO, it is just laughable when you say an independent third party just did a “comprehensive piece” about something you endorse, when one goes to the third party and finds that it published your own opinion piece.
I know you know the distinction between an independent inquiry, and choosing to include a voice of opinion, clearly marked, among many offerings.
Perhaps there’s a minor gain for the topic — hey, they didn’t reject your piece! — but as a journalist of 30 years, I can tell you that publishing someone’s opinion is not an endorsement of that opinion.
This isn’t the first time I’ve seen you do this, and — again, IMO — it erodes your credibility. You’ve got some, with me, but nobody has enough that they can twiddle theirs.
LikeLike
Point well taken! Sometimes I have overstated the subject header in order to encourage a click-through. So I do one thing that erodes my credibility. We do need to balance that against the (unrebutted) proof that the Ron Goetzel’s Koop Committee cabal has zero credibility, knowingly giving out awards to their friends that are not only undeserved, but in fact demonstrate that at least in the case of Wellsteps, actually harmed employees.
Nonetheless, I will try to up my game a bit here as you suggest.
LikeLike
By the way sometimes news media that publish opinion pieces do fact-check. The Wall Street Journal editors definitely fact-checked my assertions that the Nebraska program and Interactive Health figures were impossible before they published this. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323501004578389673547444046
LikeLike